Which song should have been the very first?

.9911 · 2011-08-10

DO you think "no church in the wild" was the perfect song to start the album?

Merix

· #2 · Aug 10, 2011

It was the perfect start that shit was beautiful.

Reply

Save

Like

Nathn

· #3 · Aug 10, 2011

Yes

Reply

Save

Like

9

.9911

Discussion Starter · #4 · Aug 10, 2011

Merix said:
It was the perfect start that shit was beautiful.

K.

Reply

Save

Like

lg

· #5 · Aug 10, 2011

yes

Reply

Save

Like

qtip1992

· #6 · Aug 10, 2011

no church in the wild is the better song but i sometimes feel like lift off was supposed to be an intro

Reply

Save

Like

Phucker

· #7 · Aug 10, 2011

No Church starts the album nicely. Lift Off on the other hand does not fit as the second track. If it really has to be on the album I'm not sure where it would fit. When you look at the original tracklisting it's the first track followed by quite good tracks. To me this album feels like they had to include fillers to the 10-track album to create this. Either way it was good that Lift Off wasn't the first track.

Reply

Save

Like

Moodmuzik

· #8 · Aug 10, 2011

Merix said:
It was the perfect start that shit was beautiful.

Reply

Save

Like

dexy baby

· #9 · Aug 10, 2011

Phucker said:
No Church starts the album nicely. Lift Off on the other hand does not fit as the second track. If it really has to be on the album I'm not sure where it would fit. When you look at the original tracklisting it's the first track followed by quite good tracks. To me this album feels like they had to include fillers to the 10-track album to create this. Either way it was good that Lift Off wasn't the first track.

Lift Off shouldn't be on the album tbh. I don't hate it, but it just doesn't fit in.
Oh and change that avatar. It's not original. + I can't recognise you.

Reply

Save

Like

Shy

· #10 · Aug 10, 2011

Dexter said:
Lift Off shouldn't be on the album tbh. I don't hate it, but it just doesn't fit in.
Oh and change that avatar. It's not original. + I can't recognise you.

In that case, Otis doesn't fit either.

Reply

Save

Like

Phucker

· #11 · Aug 10, 2011

Dexter said:
Oh and change that avatar. It's not original. + I can't recognise you.

I'll try finding something that fits tomorrow

Here is something that could motivate me a bit... lol: "Fans of Justin Timberlake and Jay-Z also ranked poorly in terms of IQ and lovers of rapper Lil' Wayne were deemed least intelligent." Even though it's old, it's still just as nice as before. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/4984680/Beyonce-fans-among-least-intelligent-but-Beethoven-fans-are-cleverest.html

Reply

Save

Like

CaCHooKa Man

· #12 · Aug 10, 2011

if kanye wasnt mumbling on lift off then that shouldve been first. but no church in the wild is just fine as the intro track.

Reply

Save

Like

Morocco Mole

· #13 · Aug 10, 2011

Merix said:
It was the perfect start that shit was beautiful.

Reply

Save

Like

dexy baby

· #14 · Aug 10, 2011

Phucker said:
I'll try finding something that fits tomorrow

Here is something that could motivate me a bit... lol: "Fans of Justin Timberlake and Jay-Z also ranked poorly in terms of IQ and lovers of rapper Lil' Wayne were deemed least intelligent." Even though it's old, it's still just as nice as before. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/music-news/4984680/Beyonce-fans-among-least-intelligent-but-Beethoven-fans-are-cleverest.html

The one you have now is good

that article is cracking me up :hah:

I'm a Queen fan :datass:

Reply

Save

Like

truman

· #15 · Aug 10, 2011

Yes.

I guess they didn't want a poppish song to be the intro of a 'real hip-hop' album, even though maybe the beginning of Lift Off sounds more 'epic'. They used one of the best lyrical songs in the album, and one of the songs that fit most its concept.