Kanye to The banner

How do you guys feel about pitchfork?

  • Who gives a fuck about pitchfork.com?

    Votes: 27 42.2%
  • I only like them when they give my fav albums high score.

    Votes: 22 34.4%
  • Their scores affect the way I feel about an album.

    Votes: 15 23.4%

Pitchfork.com

864 Views 49 Replies 26 Participants Last post by  sharky
How do you guys feel about pitchfork?
41 - 50 of 50 Posts
Black Jerry Maguire said:
Das Racist is relevant to whom? And no i don't take them seriously.

Bastard by Odd Future was in their top albums of 2010, but they didn't blow up then. hmmmm....

Those hipsters are having minimal effect on hip hop. Pitchfork is good for indie/rock or whatever but for hip hop<<<<
Das Racist is relevant obviously if they're selling out shows across the country. Their album last year was on several end-of-the-year lists, including Rolling Stone & Spin. How does that not make you relevant? A critically acclaimed album by tons of publications seems like a pretty nice deal. Just because you don't like them and they aren't widely popular doesn't mean they're irrelevant. Damn.

"Those hipsters" may have minimal effect in mainstream hip hop. You're right, they haven't blown up someone like J. Cole or Wale, or anything. But that isn't their point obviously. They want to cover more obscure, underground records. & if you honestly don't think Pitchfork didn't help Odd Future's popularity, then oh well. There's a reason Odd Future's main demographic is white, ya know?

There's a huge audience for "hipster rap": SpaceGhostPurpp, swag rap, etc. Pitchfork gets millions of views every day and is one of the most viewed music websites today. Are you really trying to says that the millions of people that follow that site daily and check out everything they post makes them irrelevant? I'd say that's a pretty big market.
See less See more
bronsd11 said:
Das Racist is relevant obviously if they're selling out shows across the country. Their album last year was on several end-of-the-year lists, including Rolling Stone & Spin. How does that not make you relevant? A critically acclaimed album by tons of publications seems like a pretty nice deal. Just because you don't like them and they aren't widely popular doesn't mean they're irrelevant. Damn.

"Those hipsters" may have minimal effect in mainstream hip hop. You're right, they haven't blown up someone like J. Cole or Wale, or anything. But that isn't their point obviously. They want to cover more obscure, underground records. & if you honestly don't think Pitchfork didn't help Odd Future's popularity, then oh well. There's a reason Odd Future's main demographic is white, ya know?

There's a huge audience for "hipster rap": SpaceGhostPurpp, swag rap, etc. Pitchfork gets millions of views every day and is one of the most viewed music websites today. Are you really trying to says that the millions of people that follow that site daily and check out everything they post makes them irrelevant? I'd say that's a pretty big market.
If touring makes you relevant, than Naughty By Nature is also still relevant >_>
Black Jerry Maguire said:
If touring makes you relevant, than Naughty By Nature is also still relevant >_>
Okay. Yeah, ignore the back half of my point completely then.
& Naughty By Nature isn't touring around the world playing MAJOR music festivals like Bonnaroo and Coachella, are they?
bronsd11 said:
Okay. Yeah, ignore the back half of my point completely then.
& Naughty By Nature isn't touring around the world playing MAJOR music festivals like Bonnaroo and Coachella, are they?
Yes, Das Racist is extremely relevant and influential :oblivious:

Millions of fans clicking on to Pitchfork are hip hop heads :oblivious:

Pitchfork has such a big influence on hip hop :oblivious:

Hipster rap is the most relevant sub genre in hip hop :oblivious:
The Man said:
Where are the madonna stans?

PANNED
This is why I love Pitchfork. This review is EXACTLY what I was thinking. While everybody was praising MDNA, I said I'm Addicted and Girl Gone Wild were the only two really good songs.
Black Jerry Maguire said:
Yes, Das Racist is extremely relevant and influential :oblivious:

Millions of fans clicking on to Pitchfork are hip hop heads :oblivious:

Pitchfork has such a big influence on hip hop :oblivious:

Hipster rap is the most relevant sub genre in hip hop :oblivious:
If you want to act like Das Racist doesn't have a following and is irrelevant to music, then be ignorant about it. Whether you like it or not, millions of people will check out what Pitchfork puts on their site, whether they're hip hop heads or not, and that's a lot of raised awareness. & I never said hipster rap is the most relevant sub genre. But acting like it isn't relevant is retarded.
bronsd11 said:
If you want to act like Das Racist doesn't have a following and is irrelevant to music, then be ignorant about it. Whether you like it or not, millions of people will check out what Pitchfork puts on their site, whether they're hip hop heads or not, and that's a lot of raised awareness. & I never said hipster rap is the most relevant sub genre. But acting like it isn't relevant is retarded.
ok buddy
TD Cruze said:
Authority? You don't have to have authority to have an opinion. Do black people have more of a right to review hip-hop music?
i think ppl who grow up loving a certain type of music shouldn't be allowed to review hip hop music because the criteria to judge hip hop music is different. i feel like there's a different way to listen to hip hop than to indie music and a lot of these reviewers might be using one frame of mind to interpret something that shouldn't be interpreted in that way. i get that music is music and it makes sense to judge it all equally but i don't think that's necessarily true.
i say that mainly because i listen to hip hop for very different reasons compared to indie music. 

i said "white" but maybe i shouldve said upperclass instead. being of a certain class might predispose someone to judge music in a particular way which might present hip hop in a different light.

so what i'm basically saying is different ppl interpret hip hop in different ways and pitchfork is run by a very homogeneous group of ppl who imo interpret hip hop in a completely different way from the ppl who claim hip hop to be their favourite genre.


EDIT: also their ability to often make or break artists is what makes this so problematic. they are a filter to the crowd who reads pitchfork and their power to decide what is good combined with their interpretation of good hip hop is just wrong.
See less See more
41 - 50 of 50 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top