Wake Up Mr. West said:rolling stone > pitchfork
Marshall Mathers said:PITCHFORK sucks
they gave good reviews to Waka & Gucci
Porcelina said:Stop trolling please. Even if that's your opinion, you saw his username and posted it. There's no need.
The Illmatic Dropout said:I like Pitchfork because at least they break down what they liked and disliked about the album and give reference points. Rolling Stone doesn't really do much but give information about tracks and such.
And while I think Gucci and Waka Flocka's albums overall were average at best, they do release pretty catchy singles. And fuck, it's for the hipster set, who don't really listen for the quality, they listen for the context.
joe said:Pitchfork is miles better than Rolling Stone, but their reviews can get astoundingly pretentious(and subsequently hilarious).