how far do u see the discussion going? honestly
Not far, really.Omari said:how far do u see the discussion going? honestly
I actually feel a little better about this.Wheelz said:
Just because people hate Pitchfork, especially after yesterday.Timesitheus said:Because the thread is bad? Or because my prediction is too high? Or both?
What happened?Porcelina said:Just because people hate Pitchfork, especially after yesterday.
They gave Waka Flocka Flame's debut album an 8.0. This went down badly, haha.Timesitheus said:What happened?
LOL, oh.Porcelina said:They gave Waka Flocka Flame's debut album an 8.0. This went down badly, haha.
ya probably like this score but i honestly dont give a fuck about pitchfork's opinionWheelz said:
lirl.Omari said:how far do u see the discussion going? honestly
no, I can understand the Waka review, but Rolling Stone gave The Jonas Brothers a four star review...FAIL!!! And at least Pitchfork isnt still sucking the cocks of Pearl Jam, U2, and Bruce Springsteen every time they put out a new album... so no, I'd rather read Drowned in SoundWake Up Mr. West said:rolling stone > pitchfork
Good call.ecabney said:so no, I'd rather read Drowned in Sound