dopeoranges said:
but that equates to you bashing the whole publication company? or even enough to go on Twitter and go apeshit?
Well, yeah, sort of. When you work for a company, you represent that company. What one LA Times writer does reflects on the LA Times. If one inserts asshole remarks or doesn't fact check properly then that's what often happens, people form opinions of the entire entity.
Probably shouldn't go apeshit on twitter, but obviously he realized that...as he deleted it.
If this is supposed to be a "review" I wouldn't consider it a very good one. There's a difference between reviewing something and just giving a play by play with a bunch of negative condescending remarks here and there. You'll notice most of the negative remarks aren't even about the film, they are about HIM.
SchizoidMan said:
Ye went to far but I see why he's mad... With the tone of that article, it's not just a negative review, it's one of those snide attempts to rain on the aura of positivity surrounding the premiere.
Implying he has delusions of grandeur.
Trying to pull a few "voice of our generation" memes with the sarcastic air-quotes.
Making his suicide confession look insincere with the sentence structure.
i remember when Time wrote about his BET performance of Power, they did something similar. Very shady and un-necessarily negative.
Exactly. The negativity is personally aimed at him. I think that's why he's mad, not because someone didn't like his film.
But that's just my take.