Kanye To The: Kanye West

OP tryna **** with the Rose stans... dumb move OP.. dumb move...

---

We have 3 guys on the floor who are second options. They may not be legit, but they all support rose to a point where we are 31-5 with rose. Who was dirks legit 2nd option last year? Your narrow perspective of how to win a championship is narrow minded.

Dirk had Jason terry as he has always been clutch and puts pressure off the defence. He also had jason kidd and a team that would not miss any open jumper last year

Having at least 2 stars is definently needed to win a championship. Even the pistons who many say won without a superstar had chauncy billups,rip hamilton, rahsheed wallace,and the defensive stopper ben wallace . My claim is a legit claim and there can not be one team that has won a championship without a 2nd option. The 2nd option creates a 2nd source of pressure for the  opponents defence and therefore allows the team to play off of them. Rose has nobody that good enough to help open his shot up in the playoffs. Boozer is a small power forward who was suppose to serve this purpose on the bulls but he has not lived up to that and therefore they will never

The thunder have everything needed but a post scorer . They have a go to scorer,2nd option,bench,sixthman, defensive stopper, big man that can play d ,defensive intensity the 2nd half of the season,and make their freethrows. Missing anything .

OP tryna **** with the Rose stans... dumb move OP.. dumb move...

Op is trollinnnnnnnnn

Dirk had Jason terry as he has always been clutch and puts pressure off the defence. He also had jason kidd and a team that would not miss any open jumper last year

Having at least 2 stars is definently needed to win a championship. Even the pistons who many say won without a superstar had chauncy billups,rip hamilton, rahsheed wallace,and the defensive stopper ben wallace . My claim is a legit claim and there can not be one team that has won a championship without a 2nd option. The 2nd option creates a 2nd source of pressure for the defence and therefore allows the team to play off of them

Dallas was shooting lights out in the Finals.Ive never seen them collectively play that good and I watch alot of basketball,

Dirk had Jason terry as he has always been clutch and puts pressure off the defence. He also had jason kidd and a team that would not miss any open jumper last year

Having at least 2 stars is definently needed to win a championship. Even the pistons who many say won without a superstar had chauncy billups,rip hamilton, rahsheed wallace,and the defensive stopper ben wallace . My claim is a legit claim and there can not be one team that has won a championship without a 2nd option. The 2nd option creates a 2nd source of pressure for the defence and therefore allows the team to play off of them

Jason Terry is not a legit second option and either is Kidd.

 Coincidentally we have Hamilton now


Anyway everything else you said is irrelevant because we have boozer, noah, deng, hamilton who fulfill the need of creating pressure of the defense, which is evident from the success they've had.

Dirk was our first and second option

how the **** are you going to compare westbrook to rose?

first of all, westbrook is stupid as ****. he takes MORE shots than durant. does chalmers take more shots than lebron? no.

durant is the best scorer on the thunder and pretty much the best scorer in the league this season. westbrook has a ego complex and tries to be the hero. he needs to realize he's robin and that durant is batman.

you can't say rose takes a lot of shots too cause really, who the **** else is going to score? boozer? deng? noah? no. they can only do so much.

can you imagine if westbrook played with lebron and took more shots than lebron? that would be stupid as ****

i give props to durant for having patience with westbrook, and not going off when westbrook takes stupid shots. durant clearly deserves mvp.

the only person who is stopping durant from winning mvp isn't lebron, it's westbrook.

lol cant really compare westbrook with chalmers doe

westbrook/durant is more like wade/lebron

but yeah westbrook makes some stupid plays at times, though i dont think it hurts the team as much as ppl say

rose is still better but i can see westbrook being just as good in the future

how the **** are you going to compare westbrook to rose?

first of all, westbrook is stupid as ****. he takes MORE shots than durant. does chalmers take more shots than lebron? no.

durant is the best scorer on the thunder and pretty much the best scorer in the league this season. westbrook has a ego complex and tries to be the hero. he needs to realize he's robin and that durant is batman.

you can't say rose takes a lot of shots too cause really, who the **** else is going to score? boozer? deng? noah? no. they can only do so much.

can you imagine if westbrook played with lebron and took more shots than lebron? that would be stupid as ****

i give props to durant for having patience with westbrook, and not going off when westbrook takes stupid shots. durant clearly deserves mvp.

the only person who is stopping durant from winning mvp isn't lebron, it's westbrook.

This is just awful, there are just so many things wrong with this

Your not creating any valid points whatsoever.

Your saying the thunder can easily handle us because we have no legit second option? Give me a regular starter on our team and I'll show you how he's stepped up and played great basketball with rose out.

This is just awful, there are just so many things wrong with this

like what

Your not creating any valid points whatsoever.

Your saying the thunder can easily handle us because we have no legit second option? Give me a regular starter on our team and I'll show you how he's stepped up and played great basketball with rose out.

You're a Bulls fan. He's a Thunder fan. You both think your team is better and neither of you are going to get anywhere =P

Your not creating any valid points whatsoever.

Your saying the thunder can easily handle us because we have no legit second option? Give me a regular starter on our team and I'll show you how he's stepped up and played great basketball with rose out.

My valid points is that the bulls are a good regular season team with one good source of offensive pressure they will come first in the east just like the Lebron james cleveland cavaliers but will fizzle out in the playoffs eventually because of this problem. The bulls need a above average scoring 2 guard to join the team not old injury proned rip hamilton

You're a Bulls fan. He's a Thunder fan. You both think your team is better and neither of you are going to get anywhere =P

True. But regardless, the reasoning fro him thinking the thunder can EASILY take us in a 7 game series isn't founded behind us having no second option. When our entire squad minus rose is a second option.

That's a retarded reason to think a team can beat another team in a 7 game series when the Mavericks are a prime example fo the opposite.

like what

First of all, they quoted their shot attempts earlier and while Westbrook takes a lot of shots, he does not take more than Durant.

2nd, Chalmers to James is a HORRIBLE comparison. Westbrook is a top 3 pg in the league, of course he's going to get his own. If Lebron and Rose played on the same team, would you be upset if sometimes Rose shot the ball more than Lebron?

3rd, the Bulls have less scoring options than the Thunder? Besides Durant and Harden, Westbrook is the only other person who can create his own shot. They NEED him to shoot to win, as evidenced by their record.

4th, Westbrook is not stopping Durant from being MVP. How the **** could Durant have led the league in scoring last year if Westbrook hogged the ball as much as you think he does? What, do you want Durant to take 30 shots a game? I don't understand.

True. But regardless, the reasoning fro him thinking the thunder can EASILY take us in a 7 game series isn't founded behind us having no second option. When our entire squad minus rose is a second option.

That's a retarded reason to think a team can beat another team in a 7 game series when the Mavericks are a prime example fo the opposite.

YOU HAVE ONE EXAMPlE to prove that it can happen name 10 other teams that won with one star the last few years.I can name at least 30 times a team has won with 2 stars

This is just awful, there are just so many things wrong with this

This is just awful, there are just so many things wrong with this

I thought about writing a rebuttal,but i realized it would be pointless trying to explain to somebody who obviously knows nothing about basketball.